|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Другие новости по теме:
Комментарии: Red eyes are the ...Red eyes are the awnser to that (google t90 red eyes if you don't know what it means). Also i believe Kontakt-5 explodes before the actual impact. Why post a video ...Why post a video in Russian with a english title........... stupid I do not believe ...I do not believe that when they designed the F-22 they were thinking of putting it in you fight of dogs with supermanageable planes, as the Russians, which yes they thought, is that the F-22 comes strongly and highly, in supercruise, throbs and you clear off, in this roll it is unbeatable. What you say brings ...What you say brings over of the invisible technology and the theory of the bird, is true, but a trained radar operator can distinguish it, specially when detecte a bird flying to 1000 km - h. On it of the temperature, the modern systems FLIR like the PIRATE are capable of detecting changes of less of 2 degrees in 60 km around, since the TYPHOON of RAF demonstrated in maneuvers with the F-22. The shielding ...The shielding reagent always is a good option, but not against missiles of a lot of power, so the Russian shielding, it is never so broad as the western ones, in addition the modern ammunition has 2 heads, the first one explodes the shielding reactivate. Friend I am going ...Friend I am going to instruct a bit in since the business works, if your enemy says that yours is good, is because your enemy wants that his chiefs give him more money, it works this way from the beginning of the times. In Iraq the T-72 they were destroyed by the children by stones in the hands. how would a ...how would a weapons systems lock on something with a radar signature of a bird?and a s-300 radar system can't be fitted to a plane way to heavy. any ways the S-300 is only Incorporated with Ultra heavy and complex land based SAM battery systems.not really the point if we are talking about plane on plane. Bullshit, being " ...Bullshit, being "STEALTH" isn't invisible on radar... it tries to minimise the detection on the radar so the radar operator thinks its just a seagull... please check your facts before commeting this American propaganda. Also, russia is in posession of anti stealth technology and radars (s-300). Funny, even though ...Funny, even though the t72 is an old tank... the americans insta feared it when it was equiped with Kontakt-5 where theyr precious m829 URANIUM rounds couldnt even penetrate... currentrly russia is developing an even more powerfull reactive armor... supposobly 5x as strong as Kontakt-5. So fuck off shithead JAJAJA another ...JAJAJA another advertising miser Russian, to the old man style USSR ohh yeahh ... they the same tank is selling from the times of the T-72 (of this tank it is the umpteenth modernization of the T-72) that in these times the children still take seriously the announcements of the Ruskis, is to shit in the beach. What? those facts ...What? those facts are correct.whats the problem? Wow! your not even ...Wow! your not even worth my time know your godam facts and stop listening to american propaganda! how can a Russian ...how can a Russian fighter hit something that its weapon systems cant see? cant be seen on radar so its main armament will not lock, it has heat dispersion technology so its secondary weapons systems won't work, the only way a Russian fighter can kill a F-22/F-35 is with its gun which also needs a radar lock. the point of stealth Aircraft is to launch a missile run and hide and repeat. they wont even see it coming. russans has and all ...russans has and all ways made shit their making a ...their making a mistake man they should invest in something that can take out the russian fighters cuz right now we have nothin the f35 is in ...the f35 is in production and being deployed to American airbases and when the U.k make there new carrier they will get some to we stopped making ...we stopped making the f35 because the sand fouled it up and it was too expensive to produce and maintain Of course, US ...Of course, US military budget more than 10 times greater than Russians. Weapon unit cost directly depends on amount of money that spends to develop and build it. US engineer earns about USD 60000 -120000 per year, russian engineer can earn only USD 15000-30000. Also russian engineers has broad specialization so we use 1 ingeneer in Russia instead 2-3 engineers in USA. All of this makes russian weapon very cheap and relible. And we no need to spend 711 billion dollars per year. you are stupid how ...you are stupid how is Americas 711 billion dollar budget less than Russia's 71.9 billion dollar budget? t . the F-22 was cancelled because the F-35 is the better option. now try comparing any Navy to the American navy. I do agree with you ...I do agree with you U.S. spends more money on equipment and takes care of their soldiers better. If Russia had same approach as U.S. or Germany , their tanks would be much better than what they are now. Yet it is still give and take in other areas. f22 relies on intel ...f22 relies on intel, and it's not designed to have dog fights. there are no more dog fights meaning airplane vs airplane. If you speak of f22 raprot than it's only right to compare it to the best air defense systems. Which would s400 which is usually integrated with number of other air defense systems... No one has had any experience going against such air defense systems, there for there is very little intel f22 can rely on in such situations. It depends where ...It depends where rpg hits, and how much additional armor it is the tanks have. Abram is good tanks... t 90 was great in the 90's.... although now the latest t90 upgrade provides far more protection to the crew. russia is spending ...russia is spending much more money to army then usa..... and have modern weapons and tanks.....and you "awesome " f22 look at pak-fa.....best plane at world this time.... your f 22 was canceled becosue that plane had a lot of crashes.... Lets hope so.Lets hope so. neither of the ...neither of the sides would launch nukes at each other, of this i am certain of |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Главная страница | Регистрация | Добавить новость | Новое на сайте Copyright © 2010 All MuZ. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
